SELECT-COMPAREでは、MTXで効果不十分な患者さんにおいて、ウパダシチニブ+MTX併用群がプラセボ+MTX併用群およびアダリムマブ+MTXを併用した群に比べて、臨床的寛解達成率(DAS28-CRP<2.6)が有意に高いことが示されました。またベースラインからのModified Total Sharp Scoreの変化量について、ウパダシチニブ+MTX併用群がプラセボ+MTX併用群と比べて、有意差を持って抑制していることが示されました。
SELECT-EARLYでは、MTX未投与の患者さんにおいて、ウパダシチニブ単独投与群がMTX投与群と比べて、臨床的寛解達成率(DAS28-CRP<2.6)が有意に高いことが示され、Modified Total Sharp Scoreの変化量についてはウパダシチニブ単独投与群がMTX併用群と比べて、有意差を持って抑制していることが示されました。
アッヴィの経営に影響を及ぼす可能性のある経済、競合状況、政府、科学技術およびその他の要因については、Securities and Exchange Commission(米国証券取引委員会)に提出済みのアッヴィの2018年度アニュアルレポート(10-K書式)の1A項「リスク要因」に記載しています。アッヴィは、法律で要求される場合を除き、本リリースの発表後に発生した出来事または変化によって、今後の見通しに関する記述を更新する義務を負わないものとします。
1. Smolen, J. et al., Upadacitinib As Monotherapy: A Phase 3 Randomised Controlled Double-Blind Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis And Inadequate Response To Methotrexate. Presented at: European League Against Rheumatism Annual Meeting;June 13-16, 2018
2. Fleischmann R, et al. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib to Placebo and to Adalimumab, in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis with Inadequate Response to Methotrexate. 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting;890
3. Burmester GR, et al;Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2503-2512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31115-2. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
4. Genovese MC, et al. Upadacitinib (ABT-494) In Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis And Inadequate Response Or Intolerance To Biological DMARDs: A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study Of A Selective JAK-1 Inhibitor. Presented at: European League Against Rheumatism Annual Meeting;June 13-16, 2018;Amsterdam, Netherlands. SAT0219.
5. van Vollenhoven, et al. A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Upadacitinib Monotherapy to MTX Monotherapy in MTX-Naïve Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis. 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting;891
6. A Study to Compare Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo in Japanese Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are on a Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) and Have an Inadequate Response to csDMARDs (SELECTSUNRISE). ClinicalTrials.gov. 2019. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02720523. Accessed on January 26,
7. Gibofsky A. Overview of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Manag Care. 2012;18:S295-S302
8. Wolfe F, Hawley DJ. The long term outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis: Work disability: A prospective 18 year study of 823 subjects. J Rheumatol. 1998;25:2108-17.
9. Gabriel SE. Cardiovascular morbidity and morbidity and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Med. 2008;121(10 Suppl 1):S9-S14
10. Young A, Koduri G, Batley M, et al. Mortality in rheumatoid arthritis. Increased in the early course of disease, in ischaemic heart disease and in pulmonary fibrosis. Rheumatology. 2007;46(2):350-7. ⑪
11. Yamanaka H, Sugiyama N, Inoue E, et al. Estimates of prevalence of and current treatment practices for rheumatoid arthritis in Japan using reimbursement data from health insurance societies and the IORRA cohort (I). Mod Rheumatol. 2014;24:33-40.
12. A Phase 3 Study to Compare ABT-494 to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (SELECT-CHOICE). Clinicaltrials.gov. 2018. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03086343. Accessed on January 26, 2019.